In a comment on another post, Bob M, from South Shore Progressive (peace and blessings be on his noggin) asks "Would they (Hillaristas) really rather have a McSame presidency?"

Yes, Bob. They would.

Now, as one trained as a social scientist, I'm facinated (like when you see a mean-looking, hairy, ugly bug crawling on your arm) with the psychology of women--putative feminsts--who would rather see a president who would:

• Dismantle Affirmative Action (which has benefitted white women more than any other group),
• Put anti-civil rights judges on the Supreme Court,
• Sashay reproductive rights back to, say, 1952, and
• Continue to send their sons and daughters to fight and die in a war we were lied to about the need for

purely, it would seem, out of spite.

Like many Black women, I've been giving the cocked eyebrow to the feminist movement since I came of age in the 80's, wondering why throughout the history of the movement, there has been such a single-minded focus on what was good for white women. An example is the "appropriate work" acts of the 60's and 70's which said, in essence, that if the caseworker could find you "appropriate work," you had to take it. For Black women, it tended to be labor-intensive. For their white sistren, it tended to be work with a discernable career path and less, well, sweat. The racialization of welfare continues today, with case workers regularly treating Black women on welfare differently than their white counterparts.

Here's the kicker: most of the workers in the social welfare system...women.

I'm just going to say it (begin Lalita rant #24): since Sojourner Truth marched up to the front of the church and asked the gathered white suffragettes, "Ain't I a Woman," many white feminists have refused to see race as a feminist issue. I can understand, from having read slave mistress diaries, how powerless they were to impact the overarching system. By the same token, I've read slave mistress diaries, and can see how many of these women reveled in the outright cruelty they could inflict on their dusky "rivals" including having them beaten for burning the morning's pancakes (end Lalita rant #24).

Where am I going with this? Maybe nowhere important, but I think it needs to be said that the FemiClintons don't speak for me...or a whole lot of women who are looking at them with sadness...

...and more than a little fear.

What they stand to do is wreak havoc on the Democratic Party (for whom this election was theirs to lose); divide Blacks and whites, in general--claiming that Blacks are only voting for Senator Obama on the basis of his pigment while ignoring their desire to have women of every color vote for Senator Clinton the basis of their plumbing; and white women from women of color in particular over very different agenda on race, gender, culture and inclusion.

If I wasn't such a lady, I'd tell these chicas to "shut the sweet fuck up."

See? Momma would be proud.

Lalita Amos's blog | login or register to post comments