American Values Alliance | Practical voice for progressive valuesLast week, the Centers for Disease Control released a study that found that a staggering 3.2 million teenage girls have a sexually transmitted disease--that's 25% of girls between the ages of 13 and 19, kids.
And I was somewhat surprised to see that the Wall Street Journal (where I go for medical advise) suggest that "Teen STD Rates Cause for Concern, Not Panic."
(sigh)
I wonder exactly when they think it's time to panic...or are they assured that their teen tots aren't teen tarts?
In the invervening week, we've been so awash with strum und drang over Barack Obama's speech and its embedded Islamofacist coded messages (which, apparently, can clearly be clearly heard if one plays the speech backwards...good luck with that), that we've missed the point here: our girls are having more and riskier sex and the teen birth rate is climbing for the first time in 15 years. According to Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America,"the national policy of promoting abstinence-only programs is a $1.5 billion failure, and teenage girls are paying the real price." Strangely, girls have equated "sex" with vaginal penetration and are opting for more anal and oral sex--certainly a boon for the boys.
Now, here's the part the part that baked my noodle: rates of STD infection were nearly half for Black girls (48%) and 20% for whites and Mexican-Americans with human papillomavirus (HPV), chlamydia, herpes, or trichomoniasis, with HPV topping the list. Oh, and this cheered my heart: The study, strangely, didn't even include syphilis, HIV or gonorrhea.
Oh, and the high rate of infection among Black girls is driving up the rate overall.
With the lower rates of use of formal medical facilities for wellness care (due to historical--or hysterical--fears of the medical community, poverty or other socioeconomic or personal accountability factors), it's no wonder that as these Black girls grow (the rest of the way) up into Black women, they are at least 50% more likely to die from cervical cancer than their white sisters.
We're failing to get the message across to our children--boys and girls--that skin-to-skin contact, while pretty yummy, can have serious consequences when the afterglow dims.
Lalita Amos's blog | login or register to post comments
I worry about this kind of stuff because I have two daughters in that age group.
I'm not sure that parents, or even the schools, are not getting the message across in similar numbers. Instead, I think we are simply outnumbered by the messages that teens get from the media of television and movies.
Most people tend to have "selective hearing" when it comes to the input they receive from peers, parents, schools, churches and the like. Teens, seem to have already assimilated that type of behavior early on in the developmental process.
Frankly, anymore there is also very little social stigma attached to having babies out of wedlock or under 18 years of age. Schools have day care, new moms live at home with their parent(s) or grandparent(s), boys walk away (as usual) scotfree, and babies are seen as "something that will love me" or a pass out of college, a job or other adult responsibility.
The chance of getting a STD is ignored just as is the chance of getting pregnant. The short term benefit outweighs the long term liability.
When it comes to the big difference in rates of infection by race, I just don't know. Are the future expectations of most young Black women that low? Has motherhood become a badge of honor? Are babies the new "must have" accessory?
This kind of statistic ought to set off alarms all over the place. Save for you, I haven't heard much noise about it.
2 hours 50 min ago
3 hours 11 min ago
4 hours 50 min ago
4 hours 52 min ago
5 hours 19 sec ago
5 hours 4 min ago
5 hours 13 min ago
16 hours 14 min ago
1 day 1 hour ago
1 day 2 hours ago