Half of Black Teens Girls Have an STD

Lalita Amos | 03/24/2008 - 11:49

Last week, the Centers for Disease Control released a study that found that a staggering 3.2 million teenage girls have a sexually transmitted disease--that's 25% of girls between the ages of 13 and 19, kids.

And I was somewhat surprised to see that the Wall Street Journal (where I go for medical advise) suggest that "Teen STD Rates Cause for Concern, Not Panic."

(sigh)

I wonder exactly when they think it's time to panic...or are they assured that their teen tots aren't teen tarts?

In the invervening week, we've been so awash with strum und drang over Barack Obama's speech and its embedded Islamofacist coded messages (which, apparently, can clearly be clearly heard if one plays the speech backwards...good luck with that), that we've missed the point here: our girls are having more and riskier sex and the teen birth rate is climbing for the first time in 15 years. According to Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America,"the national policy of promoting abstinence-only programs is a $1.5 billion failure, and teenage girls are paying the real price." Strangely, girls have equated "sex" with vaginal penetration and are opting for more anal and oral sex--certainly a boon for the boys.

Now, here's the part the part that baked my noodle: rates of STD infection were nearly half for Black girls (48%) and 20% for whites and Mexican-Americans with human papillomavirus (HPV), chlamydia, herpes, or trichomoniasis, with HPV topping the list. Oh, and this cheered my heart: The study, strangely, didn't even include syphilis, HIV or gonorrhea.

Oh, and the high rate of infection among Black girls is driving up the rate overall.

With the lower rates of use of formal medical facilities for wellness care (due to historical--or hysterical--fears of the medical community, poverty or other socioeconomic or personal accountability factors), it's no wonder that as these Black girls grow (the rest of the way) up into Black women, they are at least 50% more likely to die from cervical cancer than their white sisters.

We're failing to get the message across to our children--boys and girls--that skin-to-skin contact, while pretty yummy, can have serious consequences when the afterglow dims.


varangianguard | 03/24/2008 - 15:29 |  Teen girls are getting more than they bargained for...

I worry about this kind of stuff because I have two daughters in that age group.

I'm not sure that parents, or even the schools, are not getting the message across in similar numbers. Instead, I think we are simply outnumbered by the messages that teens get from the media of television and movies.

Most people tend to have "selective hearing" when it comes to the input they receive from peers, parents, schools, churches and the like. Teens, seem to have already assimilated that type of behavior early on in the developmental process.

Frankly, anymore there is also very little social stigma attached to having babies out of wedlock or under 18 years of age. Schools have day care, new moms live at home with their parent(s) or grandparent(s), boys walk away (as usual) scotfree, and babies are seen as "something that will love me" or a pass out of college, a job or other adult responsibility.

The chance of getting a STD is ignored just as is the chance of getting pregnant. The short term benefit outweighs the long term liability.

When it comes to the big difference in rates of infection by race, I just don't know. Are the future expectations of most young Black women that low? Has motherhood become a badge of honor? Are babies the new "must have" accessory?

This kind of statistic ought to set off alarms all over the place. Save for you, I haven't heard much noise about it.



login or register to post comments
Browse archives
« September 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Navigation

Shop Amazon.com


Support the AVA!
A non-profit organization, the American Values Alliance depends upon the generosity of contributors like yourself. Please consider giving a generous donation.
Amount $


Syndicate
Syndicate content


Who's new
  • gryfox
  • npapas
  • Ronald12
  • enh jr.
  • proudlibfromMA

Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 6 guests online.

Bye Bye!

Town Called Dobson

Town Called Dobson Daily Preview


User login

Poll
Is the focus on Palin's family over the top?
No. By pitching her family values as chief amongst her qualifications, she asked for it.
67%
Yes. Family is off limits no matter how much the candidate uses them.
33%
Not sure. It seems that we're supposed to consider family and other personal aspects--even if they don't impact policy.
0%
I. Don't. Care.
0%
Total votes: 3

Recent blog posts

Recent comments

Tiny, little posts from 'round the way

    National Public Radio

    Blogroll (Home Grown)

    Blogroll (National Blogs and Great Reads)

    Worthy organizations